In R. v. Jarvis, the Supreme Court of Canada builds on its criminal law decisions that developed the analysis of reasonable privacy expectations (including R. v. Cole, R. v. Vu, R. v. Fearon, and R. v. Spencer) with a highly nuanced, heavily contextualized framework for looking at whether there’s a reasonable expectation of privacy in the
The Supreme Court of Canada rendered R. v. Cole in which it unanimously held that employees have a diminished but reasonable expectation of privacy in the use of their workplace computers. This case involved a warrantless police search of the accused’s workplace computer, which contained materials alleged to be child pornography. Hicks Morley | Supreme Court of Canada Recognizes Dec 21, 2017 2017 SCC 59 (CanLII) | R. v. Marakah | CanLII In assessing whether Mr. Cole had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy, the Court concluded that his lack of exclusive control “diminished [his] privacy interest in his laptop, at least in comparison to the personal computer at issue in [R. v. Morelli, 2010 SCC 8, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 253], but . . . did not eliminate it entirely” (para. 58).
Privacy of Employee Records - Supreme Court of Canada
Ontario Work Computer Search Case – Privacy Concerns Real
Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in the Computer Age: A
Charterpedia - Section 8 – Search and seizure While privacy is a central or core concern under section 8 of the Charter, section 7 also provides residual protection for privacy interests (R. v. Mills, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668, and especially at paragraphs 77-89, 94, 99 and 108, where the court embedded privacy analysis based on section 8 considerations within analysis of a section 7 principle COLE v. OCOK LLC | Case No. 2:19-cv-10968-TJH Jul 22, 2020 J.Cole x Isaiah Rashad Type Beat - "Possible" (Prod.By R Jul 26, 2020 History of Magic School Bus and R.I.P. Joanna Cole - YouTube